Analyzing the Manual and Automated Assembly Line Using System Dynamics (SD) Approach

Document Type : Research Article

Authors

• Nima Pasha ¹
• Masood Rabieh ²
• Gholamreza Eslamifar ³
• Seyed Hossein Razavi Hajiagha ⁴

¹ Department of Industrial Management, University of Tehran, Kish International Campus, Tehran, Iran.

² Department of Industrial Management and Information Technology, Faculty of Management and Accounting, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran.

³ Department of Public Policy, Faculty of Management, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.

⁴ Department of Management, Faculty of Management and Financial, Khatam University, Tehran, Iran., Tehran, Iran.

10.22067/jstinp.2023.78113.1017

Abstract

Improving the responsiveness to customers’ orders is the goal of this research. Balancing the manual and automated production lines using proper equipment is crucial for the case study to reduce production costs and increase the quantity. The main problem in this research is responding to orders and demand using the proper equipment and machines in the production line. Using automated equipment can improve productivity and responses, but using advanced technology is not necessarily effective and should be organized in proportion to demands. As in this case study, there are complex cause-and-effects relations; using System Dynamics is very effective. Different productivity factors, delays, orders, etc., are considered to determine the proper production method and equipment in the long term. After that, behavioral reproduction and extreme condition testing validate the model and compare the automated production line equipment percentage usage. According to the volume of orders, the optimum case is suggested. Then, different scenarios related to customer volume are analysed, and finally, the policies are examined. As the simulation results in current conditions and market forecasting indicate, 67.2% of production line equipment should be automated. Any customer order changes can increase or decrease the results, which should be calculated accurately. Considering all the influential factors, the presented model helps the production managers have the best policy for choosing the production method. Using this method, considering some changes in the variables can be used in different industries as optimizing the production line equipment is the main key finding of this research.

Keywords

• Manufacturing Technology
• Master Production
• Assembly Line
• Systems Dynamic
• Stock and Flow Diagram

---

References

Barles, Y., 1996. Formal aspects of model validity and validation in Systems dynamics. System Dynamic Review, 12(3). https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1727(199623)12:3.

Bastan, M., Zarei, M., Tavakkoli-Moghaddam, R., Shakouri G, H., 2021.  A new technology acceptance model: a mixed-method of grounded theory and system dynamics. Kybernetes, 51(1), PP. 1-30.  https://doi.org/10.1108/K-03-2020-0127.

Chase, R., Jacobs, R., 2000. Operation Management for Competitive Management. 11th edition, McGraw-Hill, Irwin.

Deif, A., 2015. A system dynamic approach to manage changeability in Manufacturing Systems, 2nd International Materials, Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering Conference, Procedia Manufacturing, 2, pp. 543-549. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2015.07.094.

Gleeson, F., Goodman, L., Hargaden, V. and Coughlan, P., 2017. Improving worker productivity in advanced manufacturing environments. In 2017 International conference on engineering, technology and innovation (ICE/ITMC) (pp. 297-304). IEEE.

Feizabadi, J., Akhavan, M., Mahlouji, Sh., 2008. Production Management, Ketab-e-Mehraban Publication. [in Persian].

Fontes, C.H.D.O. and Freires, F.G.M., 2018. Sustainable and renewable energy supply chain: A system dynamics overview. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 82, pp.247-259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.09.033.

Gallego, S., García, M., 2018. Design and Simulation of Production and Maintenance Management Applying the Viable System Model: The Case of an OEM Plant, Materials. 11(8), p 1346. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma11081346.

Ghobadi, Sh., 2011. Dynamic Systems, First edition, Industrial Management Institute, [in Persian].

Hoseini. A., Zare Mehradji, Y., 2016. The Bullwhip Effect on the VMI-Supply Chain Management via System Dynamics", International Journal of Supply and Operations Management, 3(2), pp. 1301-1317. https://doi.org/10.22034/2016.2.05.

Jahanyan, S., Sheikhbahaei, F. and Shahin, A., 2020. Simulating the Effective Policies for Improving Demand Response Rate in an Internet Home-made Food Distribution System: a System Dynamics Approach. Production and Operations Management, 11(2), pp.89-114. https://doi.org/10.22108/jpom.2020.122222.1253.

Kashif, M. Tatjana, K. Tauno, O. Eduard, S., 2017. Performance Analysis of a Flexible Manufacturing System (FMS). Pedia CIRP. 63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2017.03.123.

Keceli, Y., Aksoy., S. Aydogdu, V., 2013. A simulation model for decision support in Ro-Ro terminal operations. International Journal of Logistics Systems and Management, 15 (4). https://doi.org/10.1504/IJLSM.2013.054896.

Mahmood, K., Karaulova, T., Otto, T. and Shevtshenko, E., 2017. Performance analysis of a flexible manufacturing system (FMS). Procedia Cirp, 63, pp.424-429. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2017.03.123.

Kazemi, S.A., Kasaei, M., 2011. Production and Operation Management, Fifth edition, SAMT Publication, .[in Persian].

Korponai, J., Tóth, Á.B. and Illés, B., 2017. The effect of the safety stock on the occurrence probability of the stock shortage. Management and production engineering review, (1). http://dx.doi.org/DOI%3A+10.1515/mper-2017-0008.

Park, K. and Li, J., 2019. Improving productivity of a multi-product machining line at a motorcycle manufacturing plant. International Journal of Production Research, 57(2), pp.470-487. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2018.1448129.

Mehraban, R., 2005. Lean Manufacturing, Jahan-e-Farda Publication.[in Persian].

Menassa, C.C. and Mora, F.P., 2009, December. Real options and system dynamics approach to model value of implementing a project specific dispute resolution process in construction projects. In Proceedings of the 2009 Winter Simulation Conference (WSC) (pp. 2635-2646). IEEE.

Mottaghi, H., Hoseinzadeh, A., 2008. Production and Operation Management, Sixth edition, Avayeh Patris Publication, [in Persian].

Nabovati, H. Taherian,T., 2012. Production Planning, First edition, Farhang-e-Rooz Publication. [in Persian].

Olivares-Aguila, J. and ElMaraghy, W.,  2021. System dynamics modelling for supply chain disruptions. International Journal of Production Research, 59(6), pp.1757-1775. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2020.1725171.

Rabieh, M. and Yasoubi, A., 2017. Dynamic Analysis of Inventory Fluctuations in Supply Chain based on System Dynamics Approach. Industrial Management Journal, 9(3), pp.539-561. https://doi.org/10.22059/imj.2018.241162.1007308.

Ross, S., 2010. A first course in probability. Pearson. http://repository.vnu.edu.vn/handle/VNU_123/80303.

Rezaei, M., Esmaeilian, G.R. and Sadeghian, R., 2021. A Two-dimensional Fix and Optimize Algorithm to Solve the Flexible Manufacturing System Lot-sizing with Co-production Problem. Production and Operations Management, 12(2), pp.93-111. https://doi.org/10.22108/jpom.2021.128753.1375.

Sterman, J.D., 2000. Business dynamics: systems thinking and modeling for a complex world. McGraw-Hill, Boston.

Tama, I.P., Akbar, Z. and Eunike, A., 2018, April. Implementation of system dynamic simulation method to optimize profit in supply chain network of vegetable product. In IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering (Vol. 337, No. 1, p. 012014). IOP Publishing.

Yong, Z. Ying, W. Long,W., 2012. Research on Demand-driven Leagile Supply Chain Operation Model: A Simulation Based on AnyLogic in System Engineering. Systems Engineering Procedia, 3, pp. 249-258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sepro.2011.11.027.

Yavuz, K., Aksoy, S., and Aydogdu, Y.V., 2013. A simulation model for decision support in Ro-Ro terminal operations. International Journal of Logistics Systems and Management, 15(4), pp.338-358. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJLSM.2013.054896.

www.arenasimulation.com.

www.rittal.us.